User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

  1. #1
    Tyre Kicker

    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Age
    26
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    Hi All,

    I've aquired a Catcams 228 0312 cam.
    Currently doing a testfit in my spare engine, and have some geometry and clearance questions.
    This cam gives around 13mm lift, with 3.85mm claimed at TDC.
    It also has a reduced base circle to archieve this.

    This means I've got to wind out the ball studs to get the spec'd clearance of 0.25mm.
    What's the minimum engagement of the studs in the head before I should look at getting extended studs?
    Currently It looks like they've got about 8mm of thread in the head.

    Second question is regarding clearance from the valves to the piston around TDC.
    What clearance between the valve and head should I maintain as the minimum?
    I imagine there's some expansion happening as the engine heats up and the rods stretch under high revs, and i'd rather not have them meet

    engine in question is a 205.

  2. #2
    Pole Position Decade Plus User
    Turbosport Administrator
    Miniliteman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    4,904
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 614 Times in 561 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    Isn't the 2280312 a F2 Speedway cam?
    For any cam with a small base circle I would use longer ball studs.
    W.r.t. the valve to piston clearance Graham will know best, just make sure to measure it not only at TDC but around it. As just after TDC the valves start to open quickly whilst the piston is only slowly moving down.

  3. #3
    TURBOSPORT SPONSOR Turbosport Subscriber
    Turbosport Moderator
    Turbosport Administrator
    Graham's Avatar
    My Race Car
    My 1st Project
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Ely, Cambs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    25,132
    Thanks
    313
    Thanked 2,479 Times in 2,253 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynxified View Post
    Hi All,

    I've aquired a Catcams 228 0312 cam.
    Currently doing a testfit in my spare engine, and have some geometry and clearance questions.
    This cam gives around 13mm lift, with 3.85mm claimed at TDC.
    It also has a reduced base circle to archieve this.

    This means I've got to wind out the ball studs to get the spec'd clearance of 0.25mm.
    What's the minimum engagement of the studs in the head before I should look at getting extended studs?
    Currently It looks like they've got about 8mm of thread in the head.

    Second question is regarding clearance from the valves to the piston around TDC.
    What clearance between the valve and head should I maintain as the minimum?
    I imagine there's some expansion happening as the engine heats up and the rods stretch under high revs, and i'd rather not have them meet

    engine in question is a 205.
    re ball studs, i would of said 5 full threads in the head would be the absolute minimum,

    valve to piston clearance, you should really work on a minimum of 1.5mm inlet 2.0mm exhaust, at high rpm the piston and rod will grow by around 0.75mm, cutting that clearance down significantly. so in theroy you would still have plenty, but you need to allow more, thermal expansion might actually change valve lift but also you need some spare in case of an over rev.

    Leon is correct, you need to check not only at TDC, but around it

  4. #4
    Tyre Kicker

    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Age
    26
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    Lovely answers both, can work with those.
    Definitely will measure the full rotation I'd already seen/read about it.

    Cam should be more of a tarmac rally cam, but I'm initially planning to stick to the 32/36, which should temper it a bit.
    Its more cam than I was looking for, but the price was right ��

  5. #5
    Pole Position Decade Plus User
    Turbosport Administrator
    Miniliteman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    4,904
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 614 Times in 561 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    A tarmac rally cam with 3.85 mm lift at TDC will not work with a 32/36 carb. And not really advisable with any carb for road use.

  6. #6
    TURBOSPORT SPONSOR Turbosport Subscriber
    Turbosport Moderator
    Turbosport Administrator
    Graham's Avatar
    My Race Car
    My 1st Project
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Ely, Cambs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    25,132
    Thanks
    313
    Thanked 2,479 Times in 2,253 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    Quote Originally Posted by Miniliteman View Post
    A tarmac rally cam with 3.85 mm lift at TDC will not work with a 32/36 carb. And not really advisable with any carb for road use.
    it would be better to say it wouldnt be a good choice, at high rpm it would work, perhaps not as well as a cam with less overlap but it would work in a fashion.

    however it wil be a pig at at the lower end of the rev range, and will probably idle about as well as a cement mixer with a missfire!

  7. #7
    Pole Position Decade Plus User
    Turbosport Administrator
    Miniliteman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    4,904
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 614 Times in 561 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    The 32/36 will start to smother (spelling?) the airflow probably at the same rpm the cam will start to work.

  8. #8
    TURBOSPORT SPONSOR Turbosport Subscriber
    Turbosport Moderator
    Turbosport Administrator
    Graham's Avatar
    My Race Car
    My 1st Project
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Ely, Cambs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    25,132
    Thanks
    313
    Thanked 2,479 Times in 2,253 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    Quote Originally Posted by Miniliteman View Post
    The 32/36 will start to smother (spelling?) the airflow probably at the same rpm the cam will start to work.
    i did run a 32/36 on an engine with a GTS4, it made 163bhp from memory, which wasnt that bad, until i say same engine on 45's made 30bhp more

  9. #9
    Tyre Kicker

    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Age
    26
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    I was worried about the cam being too much, seems like I was right there.
    These are the full specs of this cam:



    Now, I see two options here, either change carburation, or pick a different cam.
    I'm on a unported (unleaded) head, standard size valves, just overbored .5mm and decked, which should put compression at roughly 1:10.1

    I'm not looking for a race engine screaming at 7000rpm, I'd rather have something with good down low torque and drivability on the streets.
    What would you recommend I'd move towards?
    If the cam would be as easy to swap as on a CVH I'd just try it out and see how it behaves, but I don't fancy having to take the head off multiple times just to try a cam.

  10. #10
    Pole Position Decade Plus User
    Turbosport Administrator
    Miniliteman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    4,904
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 614 Times in 561 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    Quote Originally Posted by Lynxified View Post
    I'm not looking for a race engine screaming at 7000rpm, I'd rather have something with good down low torque and drivability on the streets.
    What would you recommend I'd move towards?
    Burton BF134.

  11. #11
    Mechanic snapper1's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Chelmsford
    Age
    67
    Posts
    670
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 50 Times in 48 Posts

    Re: Fast road cam geometry & clearance

    Doesn’t sound like the camshaft you have chosen is in anyway suitable for your intended purpose and rpm limit, it will make peak power near 7k rpm and not produce any torque below 3.5k rpm.
    my experience with cam changes is that you need to look at the engine spec as a whole, in your case it’s a standard engine with 10-1 compression and you want it to perform on the road, other camshafts, a good tuner and maybe look at Grahams YouTube channel to see what combinations could work for you.

    https://youtu.be/kYrheF0ta1Q

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts