WTC photo

[omj624p]

http://unix.rulez.org/~calver/pictures/wtc-photo.jpg

This is a 14mb jpg file, but the quality is amazing - worth the download time.

[RS Yod]

Re: WTC photo

i aint even seen a pic that big

yodi

[RS Yod]

Re: WTC photo

Holy shit pic just downloaded and now I know what it is, unbelievable detail.

W"hat the feck took a picture like that so big and such high quality. Still shocked

[Willid1]

Re: WTC photo




For those of you who are not too patient or on dial up.

This is a 14MB JPEG, Photoshop says the original file was 250MB

Yodi the original picture is 9372pixels square which is probably a 4000dpi scan of a 2 and a quarter inch square image - most likely taken on a Hasseblad.

David

[Willid1]

Re: WTC photo




That is a pretty amazing image, have a look HERE for more amazing ariel photos - from a satellite this time.

David

[Willid1]

Re: WTC photo



This image is from the Space Imaging website, I have reduced it quite a bit.

The legend reads

"This one-meter resolution satellite image of Manhattan, New York was collected at 11:43 a.m. EDT on Sept. 12, 2001 by Space Imaging's IKONOS satellite. The image shows an area of white dust and smoke at the location where the 1,350-foot towers of the World Trade Center once stood. Since all aircraft were grounded following the attack on America it's the only high-resolution 'view from above' of the fire and destruction of the twin towers."

David

[RS Yod]

Re: WTC photo

Whats a Hasseblad??

Im seriously amazed by the quality.

[Willid1]

Re: WTC photo



Yodi aren't you getting married soon?. Look out for something like this around the photographers neck.

Hasselblad have been the top dog of medium format cameras (albeit a very expensive top dog) for about the past 50 years.

All the photos taken on the Moon by the Apollo astronauts were taken on specially adapted Hasselblads - which where left behind to save weight on the return journey (anorak off!!!)

David

[RS Yod]

Re: WTC photo

Yes mate got 8 weeks of freedom left

I didnt think a prehistoric thing like that could take pic like the quality of the above

[Tone]

Re: WTC photo

do you mean the ones allegedly taken on the moon funny that the camera maker said he could'nt use the cameras he made on earth let alone on the moon
don't forget there was no viewer so how did hey manage to take perfect pictures????????also there was the cross hair pics that were put on afterwords

[popuptoaster]

Re: WTC photo

do you mean the ones allegedly taken on the moon funny that the camera maker said he could'nt use the cameras he made on earth let alone on the moon
don't forget there was no viewer so how did hey manage to take perfect pictures????????also there was the cross hair pics that were put on afterwords

Rubbsh mate, that conspiracy stuff is bollox, the astronauts had them cameras at home with em for months before the mission to parctise with, there are still shots of there families and holidays that were taken and they are framed and focused perfectly too, the manufacterer was on the telly on the moon mission programme a couple of months ago demonstrating how easy the moon ones are to use.

most of that "we didnt really go to the moon" stuff can be discounted with a little bit of research, dont believe the hype!!!!

[Willid1]

Re: WTC photo

I was going to reply to Tony's post but I couldn't work out if he was serious or not .

I do quite like the conspiracy theories surrounding the Moon landings but don't think they are true.

One thing I would say though is having been to Cape Canaveral and seen just how little technology they used (in modern terms) to send those guys to the Moon the astronauts were either very stupid (to get in the rocket) or had massive balls.

I would like to think it was the latter.

David

[Tone]

Re: WTC photo

the camera was strapped to his chest without a viewfinder have you seen the film of the landindings it makes you think

also has anybody seen the video about building 7 next to the world trade center ???it make an intresting watch half way up the building it has a bomb/160mph wind proof bunker built in it opposite the WTC it even has its own air/water supply this was the mayors own building owned by the government
and it mysteriously burned to the ground when it had nothing fall on it and it had a few small fires that could be seen that the sprinklers could have put out also when it fell down they have film of it it inplodes from the top???just like when they do a demolition i will try to find the link
but what its saying is they blew the wtc up incase it fell on the stock market etc
i found this one
http://www.wtc7.net/

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/wtc7.html

[Mk2Matt]

Re: WTC photo

Just had a look at that site and it makes you think doesn't it. It all appears to make sence, however, you do have to be so careful about hat you believe from these conspiracy theorys.

Matt